PhotonIcs and Electromagnetics Research Symposium,
also known as Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium
PIERS Proceedings
Published: 2015-07-09
Investigation of Switched Reluctance Machine for EV Propulsion Unit with Torque Smoothening Strategy
By
Proceedings of 2015 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Prague, July 6 - 9,Page(s)463-468
Abstract
The paper deals with the investigation of a 30 kW switched reluctance machine (SRM) designed to be used in the automotive industry, as propulsion unit for electrical vehicles (EV). The paper details the most important steps when designing such an electrical machine, and validates the structure using advanced co-simulation techniques, coupling finite element analysis software (Cedrat Flux 2D) with software used to implement the controller (Matlab/Simulink). As the advantages of the SRM are known, its main drawback, the torque ripples, are reduced as much as possible using a dedicated control strategy, the torque sharing functions (TSF). The solution offered by the paper highlights the possibility of using a cheap, reliable and robust electrical machine for propulsion unit.
Citation
Daniel Fodorean, and Mircea Ruba, "Investigation of Switched Reluctance Machine for EV Propulsion Unit with Torque Smoothening Strategy," Proceedings of 2015 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Prague, July 6 - 9,Page(s)463-468
References

1. Vrazic, Mario, Damir Vuljaj, Arsen Pavasovic, and Hrvoje Paukovic, "Study of a vehicle conversion from internal combustion engine to electric drive," 1544–1548, May 2014.
doi:10.1109/energycon.2014.6850628        Google Scholar

2. Omekanda, A. M., "Switched reluctance machines for EV and HEV propulsion: State-of-the-art," 2013 IEEE Workshop on Electrical Machines Design, Control and Diagnosis (WEMDCD), 70–74, March 2013.
doi:10.1109/wemdcd.2013.6525166        Google Scholar

3. Ruba, M., L. Szabo, and D. Fodorean, "Design and analysis of low voltage high current SRM for small automotive applications," International Symposium on Power Electronics Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, 341–346, June 2012.
doi:10.1109/speedam.2012.6264443        Google Scholar

4. Ruba, Mircea, Ioan‐Adrian Viorel, and Loránd Szabó, "Modular stator switched reluctance motor for fault tolerant drive systems," IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 7, No. 3, 159–169, March 2013.
doi:10.1049/iet-epa.2012.0140        Google Scholar

5. Ruba, M. and D. Fodorean, "Design, analysis and torque control of low voltage high current SRM for small automotive applications," Eurocon 2013, 1498–1503, July 2013.
doi:10.1109/eurocon.2013.6625176        Google Scholar

6..

7. Dowlatshahi, Milad, Seyed Morteza Saghaeian Nejad, and Jin-Who Ahn, "Torque ripple minimization of switched reluctance motor using modified torque sharing function," 2013 21st Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), 1–6, May 2013.
doi:10.1109/iraniancee.2013.6599580        Google Scholar

8. Hwu, K.I. and C.M. Liaw, "Intelligent tuning of commutation for maximum torque capability of a switched reluctance motor," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 18, No. 1, 113–120, March 2003.
doi:10.1109/tec.2002.808406        Google Scholar

9. Mademlis, C. and I. Kioskeridis, "Performance optimization in switched reluctance motor drives with online commutation angle control," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 18, No. 3, 448–457, September 2003.
doi:10.1109/tec.2003.815854        Google Scholar

10. Sahoo, N.C., J.X. Xu, and S.K. Panda, "Low torque ripple control of switched reluctance motors using iterative learning," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 16, No. 4, 318–326, 2001.
doi:10.1109/60.969470        Google Scholar

11. Pop, A.-C., V. Petrus, C. S. Martis, V. Iancu, and J. Gyselinck, "Comparative study of different torque sharing functions for losses minimization in Switched Reluctance Motors used in electric vehicles propulsion," 2012 13th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM), 356–365, May 2012.
doi:10.1109/optim.2012.6231852        Google Scholar