PhotonIcs and Electromagnetics Research Symposium,
also known as Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium
PIERS Proceedings
Published: 2015-07-09
New Intuitive Metrics for Diversity Performance Evaluation of Multi-element Antenna Systems
By
Proceedings of 2015 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Prague, July 6 - 9,Page(s)1963-1965
Abstract
Diversity performance of multi-element antenna (MEA) systems is evaluated using several metrics. The most common are the diversity antenna gain (DAG), the effective diversity gain (EDG) and the actual diversity gain (ADG). These metrics calculate the performance by comparing the MEA system with the reference antenna at a fixed outage probability level, i.e., usually at 1% outage level. As fixed outage levels are just an indication of probability of occur- rence of specific signal levels, they provide limited insight into realistic deep-fade cases. Thus, we introduce three novel metrics, namely, the fading mitigation gain (FMG), the reliability per- centage (RP) and the generalized diversity antenna gain (GDAG) for characterizing diversity performance when deep fades take place in one or more of the diversity branches. Based on the aforementioned metrics, intuitive knowledge on the diversity performance of MEA systems is provided.
Citation
Petros Karadimas, and Vasileios C. Papamichael, "New Intuitive Metrics for Diversity Performance Evaluation of Multi-element Antenna Systems," Proceedings of 2015 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Prague, July 6 - 9,Page(s)1963-1965
References

1. Ogawa, K. and J. Takada, "An analysis of the effective performance of a handset diversity antenna influenced by head, hand, and shoulder effects --- A proposal for a diversity antenna gain based on a signal bit error rate and analytical results for the PDC system," Electronics and Communications in Japan, Part 2, Vol. 84, No. 6, 852-865, 2001.
doi:10.1002/ecjb.1031        Google Scholar

2. Kildal, P., K. Rosengren, J. Byun, and J. Lee, "Definition of effective diversity gain and how to measure it in a reverberation chamber," Microwave Optical Technology Letters, Vol. 34, No. 1, 56-59, 2002.
doi:10.1002/mop.10372        Google Scholar

3. Plicanic, V., B.-K. Lau, A. Derneryd, and Z. Ying, "Actual diversity performance of a multiband diversity antenna with hand and head effects," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 57, No. 5, 1547-1556, May 2009.
doi:10.1109/tap.2009.2016707        Google Scholar

4. Papamichael, V. and C. Soras, "Generalised selection combining diversity performance of multi-element antenna systems via a stochastic electromagnetic-circuit methodology," IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 4, No. 7, 837-846, July 2010.
doi:10.1049/iet-map.2009.0007        Google Scholar

5. Karaboikis, M., V. Papamichael, G. Tsachtsiris, C. Soras, and V. Makios, "Integrating compact printed antennas onto small diversity/MIMO terminals," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 56, No. 7, 2067-2078, July 2067.
doi:10.1109/tap.2008.924677        Google Scholar

6. Zeland Software Inc., IE3D, http://www.zeland.com/.        Google Scholar