PhotonIcs and Electromagnetics Research Symposium,
also known as Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium
PIERS Proceedings
Published: 2015-07-09
A Couple of Topics in Numerical Analysis of Diffraction by a Metal Grating Using Yasuura's Method of Modal Expansion
By
Proceedings of 2015 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Prague, July 6 - 9,Page(s)1947-1951
Abstract
Assuming the progress of numerical solution of grating problems by Yasuura’s method of modal expansion, we pick up a couple of issues that require our countermeasure, state our step, and give our opinion if appropriate. Here we take up: choice of modal functions; observation of condition number in least-squares boundary matching; and use of refractive indices of Au taken from references.
Citation
Toyonori Matsuda, Yoichi Okuno, and Xun Xu, "A Couple of Topics in Numerical Analysis of Diffraction by a Metal Grating Using Yasuura's Method of Modal Expansion," Proceedings of 2015 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Prague, July 6 - 9,Page(s)1947-1951
References

1. Yasuura, K. and T. Itakura, "Approximation method for wave functions (I), (II), and (III)," Kyushu Univ. Tech. Rep., Vol. 38, No. 1, 72-77, 1965; Vol. 38, No. 4, 378-385, 1966; Vol. 39, No, 1, 51-56, 1966.        Google Scholar

2. Ikuno, H. and K. Yasuura, "Improved point-matching method with application to scattering from a periodic surface," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 21, 657-662, 1973.        Google Scholar

3. Petit, R., et al., Electromagnetic Theory of Gratings, R. Petit, ed., Chapters 1 (R. Petit) and 2 (M. Cadilhac), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980.        Google Scholar

4. Okuno, Y., "An introduction to the Yasuura method," Analytical and Numerical Methods in Electromagnetic Wave Theory, 515-565, M. Hashimoto, M. Idemen, and O. A. Tretyakov, ed., Science House, Tokyo, 1993.        Google Scholar

5. Recall that: the mth Fourier coefficient of a continuous and periodic function is in proportion to m⁻²; while that of a discontinuous periodic function is m⁻¹.        Google Scholar

6. This is the reason why we have introduced the Smoothing Procedure (see e.g., Okuno [4]), but we do not go further into this subject.        Google Scholar

7. Chandezon, J., M. T. Dupuis, G. Cornet, and D. Maystre, "Multicoated gratings: A differential formalism applicable in the entire optical region," J. Opt. Soc. Amer., Vol. 72, 839-846, 1982.        Google Scholar

8. Hafner, C., The Generalized Multipole Technique for Computational Electromagnetics, Artech House, Boston, 1990.        Google Scholar

9. Wriedt, T., ed., Generalized Multipole Techniques for Electromagnetic and Light Scattering, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999.        Google Scholar

10. Yamaguchi, H., "The idea of equivalent sources in the Yasuura method," Thesis for Master Degree, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, 1993 (in Japanese).        Google Scholar

11. Ohtsu, M., Y. Okuno, A. Matsushima, and T. Suyama, "A combination of up- and down-going Floquet modal functions used to describe the field inside grooves of a deep grating," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 64, 293-316, 2006.        Google Scholar

12. Although we gave J = 2M below (3), this is an experimental rule and should be employed after examination.        Google Scholar

13. Hass, G. and L. Hadley, "Optical properties of metals," American Inst. Phys. Handbook, 2nd Edition, D. G. Gray, ed., 6-107, McGraw-Hill, NY, 1963.
doi:10.1364/josa.48.000324        Google Scholar

14. Palik, E. D., Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, Academic Press, Boston, 1998.        Google Scholar

15. Johnson, P. B. and R. W. Christy, "Optical constants of the noble metals," Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 6, 4370, Published December 15, 1972.
doi:10.1103/physrevb.6.4370        Google Scholar

16. Rakik, A. D., A. B. Djurisic, J. M. Elazar, and M. L. Majewski, "“Optical properties of metallic films for vertical-cavity optoelectronic devices," App. Opt., Vol. 37, 5271-5283, 1998.        Google Scholar