PhotonIcs and Electromagnetics Research Symposium,
also known as Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium
PIERS Proceedings
Published: 2015-07-09
Effect of Frequent Degree of Deceiving on the Prefrontal Cortical Response to Deception: A Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study
By
Proceedings of 2015 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Prague, July 6 - 9,Page(s)1482-1485
Abstract
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is an emerging brain-imaging tech- nique which has been used to various areas. Previous studies have indicated that frequent de- ceiving would make deceiving easier. In this study, fNIRS was used to explore the effect of frequent degree of deceiving on the prefrontal cortical response to deception. Self-related ques- tions were used in the experiment. The results showed different patterns of neural activation between non-frequent deceiving and frequent deceiving. In Channel 11 (in the left prefrontal cortex), non-frequent deceiving led to a greater neural activation than telling the truth, while this pattern did not appear in frequent deceiving. Our finding suggested that fNIRS has ability to detect deception under different situations.
Citation
Qianqian Gao, Sailing He, Ziqiang Hu, Fang Li, Shijing Wu, Guixiong Xu, Jie Xu, and Huilin Zhu, "Effect of Frequent Degree of Deceiving on the Prefrontal Cortical Response to Deception: A Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study," Proceedings of 2015 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Prague, July 6 - 9,Page(s)1482-1485
References

1. Leff, D. R., F. Orihuela-Espina, C. E. Elwell, et al. "Assessment of the cerebral cortex during motor task behaviours in adults: A systematic review of functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies," Neuroimage, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2922-2936, 2011.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.058        Google Scholar

2. Pouliot, P., T. P. Y. Tran, V. Birca, et al. "Hemodynamic changes during posterior epilepsies: An EEG-fNIRS study," Epilepsy Research, Vol. 108, No. 5, 883-890, 2014.
doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.03.007        Google Scholar

3. Elwell, C., "Shedding light on brain development," NIR News, Vol. 25, No. 8, 25-27, 2014.
doi:10.1255/nirn.1494        Google Scholar

4. Gálvez-Cerón, A., E. Serrano, J. Bartolomé, et al. "Predicting seasonal and spatial variations in diet quality of Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica) using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy," European Journal of Wildlife Research, Vol. 59, No. 1, 115-121, 2013.        Google Scholar

5. Zhu, H., Y. Fan, H. Guo, et al. "Reduced interhemispheric functional connectivity of children with autism spectrum disorder: Evidence from functional near infrared spectroscopy studies," Biomedical Optics Express, Vol. 5, 1262-1274, 2014.
doi:10.1364/boe.5.001262        Google Scholar

6. Vartanian, O., P. J. Kwantes, D. R. Mandel, et al. "Right inferior frontal gyrus activation as a neural marker of successful lying," Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 7, 616, 2013.
doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00616        Google Scholar

7. Sai, L., X. Zhou, X. P. Ding, et al. "Detecting concealed information using functional nearinfrared spectroscopy," Brain Topography, Vol. 27, No. 5, 652-662, 2014.
doi:10.1007/s10548-014-0352-z        Google Scholar

8. Ding, X. P., X. Gao, G. Fu, et al. "Neural correlates of spontaneous deception: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study," Neuropsychologia, Vol. 51, No. 4, 704-712, 2013.
doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.018        Google Scholar

9. Verschuere, B., A. Spruyt, E. H. Meijer, et al. "The ease of lying," Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 20, No. 3, 908-911, 2011.
doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.10.023        Google Scholar

10. Greene, J. D. and J. M. Paxton, "Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106, 12506-12511, 2009.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0900152106        Google Scholar

11. Jiang, W., H. Liu, J. Liao, et al. "A functional MRI study of deception among offenders with antisocial personality disorders," Neuroscience, Vol. 244, 90-98, 2013.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.03.055        Google Scholar

12. Marchewka, A., K. Jednorog, M. Falkiewicz, et al. "Sex, lies and fMRI --- Gender differences in neural basis of deception," PloS One, Vol. 7, No. 8, e43076, 2012.        Google Scholar

13. Ganis, G., R. R. Morris, and S. M. Kosslyn, "Neural processes underlying self- and other-related lies: An individual difference approach using fMRI," Social Neuroscience, Vol. 4, No. 6, 539-553, 2009.        Google Scholar

14. Koessler, L., L. Maillard, A. Benhadid, et al. "Automated cortical projection of EEG sensors: Anatomical correlation via the international 10-10 system," Neuroimage, Vol. 46, No. 1, 64-72, 2009.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.006        Google Scholar

15. Tak, S., S. J. Yoon, J. Jang, et al. "Quantitative analysis of hemodynamic and metabolic changes in subcortical vascular dementia using simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy and fMRI measurements," Neuroimage, Vol. 55, No. 1, 176-184, 2011.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.046        Google Scholar

16. Ding, X. P., L. Sai, G. Fu, et al. "Neural correlates of second-order verbal deception: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study," Neuroimage, Vol. 87, 505-514, 2014.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.023        Google Scholar